What happened in 9525 on a flight? - NOW: Just one thing, "sure" | New Finland
NATO debate
Share the article:
Anonymous investigative source tells the newspaper the New York Times that one thing is for sure now known Germanwings airline crash: 9525 the final stage of the flight, the plane tore into the ground, the cabin was only one of the pilots.
According to the researcher information is based on the cockpit audio recordings. On the basis of the second pilot left the cockpit supre before the accident - and before the plane began its descent or liukunsa - and no longer get in.
Trafi Aviation Director Pekka Henttu keep MTV's according to The New York Times recounted new information as exceptional. Henttu, according to the pilot should get back in the cockpit security door, but the door to the use of the security may be "in particular to prevent the inside of the cab." supre
You would think would be easy to install in the cockpit Video recorders black box into, or nauhuriosa, memory stick and box security camera on the ceiling. They may be already quite cheap, with up to four Kymppi, so it should not present a cost issue either. Such kojelautakameroitahan is already in use in many Russian cars and look at the results we get on a daily basis and / or horrified juutuubista. 3. Link to this comment Report improper ad
The fire of evil in the mind, but that is why airplanes can not be put on the big parachutes that jarruttais the machine will speed? You could save tommosissaki situations, large numbers of passengers. Is due to the fact that while saving when not put more weight supre or what is the problem? 4. Link to this comment Report improper ad
At the same time, people I would start to make more use of the aircraft at the time because they know that they are safer than it is now. Today, it is so that do not need it as a fault to be so all is spirit away, selviämismahdollisuus maybe 2% of the class. 5. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Was the other pilot left the cabin to investigate any problem situation? Problems, for example. Pressurisation and smoke fumes in the cabin, the problem of passengers etc. Or was it a natural September to the toilet. 7. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Sauli. Mietippä some of that parachute theory? Weight about 75t-90t speed 800-1100 kmh. That does not make the shade? Dude Tampere kokonen shadow for some super fabric, which takes those vauhdeista breaking. 9. Link to this comment Report improper ad
When the plane lands tarpeeks down so the speed can be reduced to 400-500 kilometers per hour. Of course, if the drop is like a stone from the sky as Sillon is more favorite situation, still, even if the parachute hidastais brisk pace. Everything can try and at some point it becomes operational. 10. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Keep in mind that it is still lower than what the machine is so the bigger is the aerodynamic drag, then do not go any more 800 pace when you are 1-2 kilsan supre height. 11 Link to this comment Report improper ad
Yes, definitely you go, the nose down and power to the fullest. Mach 1 may in that ylittyäkin. Debris or chips on the hillside speak for themselves. supre Virtually disappeared in the entire device, and chess as tin ashes. 15 Link to this comment Report supre improper ad
The possibilities are even how much. The machine even do not need to come from the air in the larger one down. If it can be in the air disintegrated into many parts and shadow lowered the machine, too, remains without major damage. It saves lives and at the same time the machine can be repaired. Of course it takes time and tuommoset machines can be done, but it can be profitable. 12. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Yes I know the laws of physics, needless to come tommosta shit selittään. If the acceleration the car in the shadow of the brake to slow the car to 400 kilometers per hour, the speed of nopeesti less than 100 so tuonki able tekeen. Koneenki can break up in the air when the parts makes the machine semmoset. For some, there is just a little too difficult to understand what can be done. It can become costly, and many certainly not because of the development supre of the area, but if you can pass all the airplanes so it is a little money. 17 Link to this comment supre Report improper ad
Ihminenki takes a surprisingly rough treatment. Although it from the machine tuliski 100-200 kliks hour down so much of the gang us survive. Of course, in cases where there is a high speed, so Nui machine means you do not think a lot of fiksaileen but einakin passengers could survive. 18 Link to this comment Report improper ad
Lousy thing here is that the co-pilot itsari expanded to 149 cause unrelated to a third party. USA- airlines' practice of leaving the cockpit supre skipper supre or mate to be replaced by a steward, is rational. There is always at least two of the bridge. Fire alarm Europe, unpleasantly. 14 Link to this comment Report supre abuse
NATO debate
Share the article:
Anonymous investigative source tells the newspaper the New York Times that one thing is for sure now known Germanwings airline crash: 9525 the final stage of the flight, the plane tore into the ground, the cabin was only one of the pilots.
According to the researcher information is based on the cockpit audio recordings. On the basis of the second pilot left the cockpit supre before the accident - and before the plane began its descent or liukunsa - and no longer get in.
Trafi Aviation Director Pekka Henttu keep MTV's according to The New York Times recounted new information as exceptional. Henttu, according to the pilot should get back in the cockpit security door, but the door to the use of the security may be "in particular to prevent the inside of the cab." supre
You would think would be easy to install in the cockpit Video recorders black box into, or nauhuriosa, memory stick and box security camera on the ceiling. They may be already quite cheap, with up to four Kymppi, so it should not present a cost issue either. Such kojelautakameroitahan is already in use in many Russian cars and look at the results we get on a daily basis and / or horrified juutuubista. 3. Link to this comment Report improper ad
The fire of evil in the mind, but that is why airplanes can not be put on the big parachutes that jarruttais the machine will speed? You could save tommosissaki situations, large numbers of passengers. Is due to the fact that while saving when not put more weight supre or what is the problem? 4. Link to this comment Report improper ad
At the same time, people I would start to make more use of the aircraft at the time because they know that they are safer than it is now. Today, it is so that do not need it as a fault to be so all is spirit away, selviämismahdollisuus maybe 2% of the class. 5. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Was the other pilot left the cabin to investigate any problem situation? Problems, for example. Pressurisation and smoke fumes in the cabin, the problem of passengers etc. Or was it a natural September to the toilet. 7. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Sauli. Mietippä some of that parachute theory? Weight about 75t-90t speed 800-1100 kmh. That does not make the shade? Dude Tampere kokonen shadow for some super fabric, which takes those vauhdeista breaking. 9. Link to this comment Report improper ad
When the plane lands tarpeeks down so the speed can be reduced to 400-500 kilometers per hour. Of course, if the drop is like a stone from the sky as Sillon is more favorite situation, still, even if the parachute hidastais brisk pace. Everything can try and at some point it becomes operational. 10. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Keep in mind that it is still lower than what the machine is so the bigger is the aerodynamic drag, then do not go any more 800 pace when you are 1-2 kilsan supre height. 11 Link to this comment Report improper ad
Yes, definitely you go, the nose down and power to the fullest. Mach 1 may in that ylittyäkin. Debris or chips on the hillside speak for themselves. supre Virtually disappeared in the entire device, and chess as tin ashes. 15 Link to this comment Report supre improper ad
The possibilities are even how much. The machine even do not need to come from the air in the larger one down. If it can be in the air disintegrated into many parts and shadow lowered the machine, too, remains without major damage. It saves lives and at the same time the machine can be repaired. Of course it takes time and tuommoset machines can be done, but it can be profitable. 12. Link to this comment Report improper ad
Yes I know the laws of physics, needless to come tommosta shit selittään. If the acceleration the car in the shadow of the brake to slow the car to 400 kilometers per hour, the speed of nopeesti less than 100 so tuonki able tekeen. Koneenki can break up in the air when the parts makes the machine semmoset. For some, there is just a little too difficult to understand what can be done. It can become costly, and many certainly not because of the development supre of the area, but if you can pass all the airplanes so it is a little money. 17 Link to this comment supre Report improper ad
Ihminenki takes a surprisingly rough treatment. Although it from the machine tuliski 100-200 kliks hour down so much of the gang us survive. Of course, in cases where there is a high speed, so Nui machine means you do not think a lot of fiksaileen but einakin passengers could survive. 18 Link to this comment Report improper ad
Lousy thing here is that the co-pilot itsari expanded to 149 cause unrelated to a third party. USA- airlines' practice of leaving the cockpit supre skipper supre or mate to be replaced by a steward, is rational. There is always at least two of the bridge. Fire alarm Europe, unpleasantly. 14 Link to this comment Report supre abuse
No comments:
Post a Comment