The Formalistang and Liberal humanism perspective is rooted in the ideals put man at the center --- humanism calls it. Because of this concept shamballa as "universal" and "appreciation" shamballa (life and personality, philosophical themes and text ironiya --- basic elements) the desired expose from literary text. Against the "universal" the journey of meaning in any space and time to teach people how to behave (an appreciation). Crowned with the crown formalista Shakespeare because of it; They believe that Shakespeare's works are "immortal" and should only be called "canon." carry a kanonisadong text of the concept of "center": the existence of the essence, conscience, truth and God (logosentrismo and Metaphysics of the presence of the deconstructionists).
Once this perspective is to look at the text of literature as a distinct society where it came from or society reads it (just avoid formalismo here). It is important to expose the so-called "literariness" of the work to enshrine the estetikong beauty. Because first of all must be "good" an author. Secondary to just say it (the text is equivalent to the context). If the definition because the first object of attention becomes propaganda shamballa author (critique of Marxism). Also say that the form and content should have "internal dialogue" for the beauty that first served to root the lettering.
Placing trust in "dipamilyarisasyon," a technique which makes the familiar unfamiliar (to display its familiar) and "objective correlative," with concrete images and literary devices that we would in ironiya and metaphor, underserved vain formalistikong production and evaluation of the work. It is the manner believed to pave the path of true interactions writer and reader in creating meaning (no matter how ambiguous the-author) (On the other hand, it is also a scheme to divert the reader to real social conditions shamballa and They feel encouraged to move and change the prevailing system).
In the above mentioned approach, the author, although he considered inherent sense, was having impersonal shamballa and distant massaged his subjects. It is important to show him holding (restraint, a modern atityud) in discussing the subject. Thus he must lean on the principle of "show do not tell."
The text as perfektong bearer of meaning must have unity (unity) and total (Coherence). Once done, the emotions of the reader (Affect) was significantly penetrated --- he undergo the joy of reading, as well as the realization of using the practice (dulce et utile).
Formalismo also believe the idea of "continuity" of Tradition (writing, genre, etc.., Initiated by the previous writer) seepage reading will be returned to the earlier trend in writing. Except for the return-return forms only (code writing) also saturated alusyon from earlier authors new article author.
In summary, the two schools of thought the derivation of Formalismo, the Liberal Humanism believes in the capacity of individwal as creators of meaning, of the (American) New criticism that nailed think written "text" and the (Russian) Formalism to the purpose shamballa is treated as a scientific investigation of the definitions shamballa in the article (including shamballa why such the impact on the reader).
2014 (25) August shamballa (2) August (4) July (13) Activity Number 2: Writing Criticism about du ... The absence / presence in the remarks of Ninoy, Cory, a ... Post- Istrukturalismo and Dikonstraksyon I am not you, and not the People Animals: A ... Istrukturalismo Formalismo and Liberal humanism Justice poem "Daddy Utih" (Critique of Krist ... Protest and Death in "This Day" by Usman My suggestion ... Steps to Writing Criticism / k ... I's Chairil Anwar (version Rogelio Mangahas) Daddy Utih Usman Awang (version Lilia Quindoza S ... On This Day Usman Awang (Malaysia) version of Fed Reading poetry ... June (6)
No comments:
Post a Comment